peer review

so much about saying giving each other equal marks and in the end someone just have to backstab us.

why is my marks lower than others? i was being called on with less 48 hours to cover for someone else and i did my part without complaining. i put aside my revision and rush the project. i spent 6 hours with the rest discussing the project on a sat afternoon when a member went MIA!!! fucking hell. the lecturer shld know this man!!!

in the end, my work wasn't being appreciated and worse still, i got penalized.

i waited 3 hours for the last meeting to start and someone just went home and did a video conferencing with us. i shld just have just gone back to hall and did a skype too!!! fuck!!! i was there as much as possible. i raise up doubts about the part that i was ordered to do saying that they are not continuous variables and u fucking hell.. asking me to continue and in the end turn them into dummy variables. i submit my work on time and try my best in helping the rest. so why was i being penalized? it all boils down to playing this game of survivor series isn't it?

damn.. cos of this stupid peer evaluation, i was even further behind the mean score. i have nothing to lose.. n i will seriously consider bring this issue up to the lecturer!!!

for the another project which doesn't have peer evaluation, i worked my life out and no body cared. the school should have one standard way of evaluating projects!!! what's the point of me working so hard for one and doing normally for the other and in the end, other people benefit??

fuck them!